Showing posts with label Empirical findings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Empirical findings. Show all posts

Thursday, November 28, 2013

When to use credit Repair Companies

      

          What if you have done all that and still cannot remove some of the negative marks on your credit? That is when it is time for a credit repair company.
I had an error on my credit report where a company had listed two accounts for me. I only had one account and the other account was hurting my credit. I disputed the false account and told them I only had one. They some how verified the account anyway. I tried calling the company to tell them it was false, but nobody would return my calls.That is when I went looking for a credit repair company to fight for me. Within 30 days they removed the false account and my score increased quite a bit.
When looking for a credit repair company, there are a few things to find out.
- Do they have attorneys on staff to deal with the bureaus? For some reason an attorney can get the bureaus to listen more than a regular private citizen.
- They must have a refund policy. This is important. If the company performs as they say they do, they will offer a money back guarantee. If they don’t do what they say they will do, you shouldn’t have to pay. A satisfaction guarantee where they will continue to work for you until you are satisfied doesn’t mean much if they can’t get the job done in the first place.
- Check for testimonials. The company should advertise their satisfied clients. If you can’t find any on their site there may not be any at all.
- The company should have years of experience. Startup companies may not have the relations and “know how” that come with experience. Be sure the company has been around.
Lexington Law is one credit repair company that meets the requirements above. They have been in business for over 15 years and have a proven track record with more than 500,000 clients.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Empirical findings


    Empirical studies show that price and income elasticities tend to vary considerably
between different goods and services. In general, price elasticities for food,
fuel, health and housing services are found to be low ; while price elasticities
of demand for clothing, communications and purchased transport tend to be
high . Even at this broad level of generality, there are sharp differences in elasticity values for the same products across countries. Elasticities are also sensitive
to the precise specification of the product. The price elasticity of demand for
haddock has been estimated at 2.2, much higher than the price elasticity of fish
and higher still than the elasticity of food._7 Services have been found to have a low price elasticity in general, but individual items have much higher elasticities, such as recreation. Within recreation, the price elasticity of demand for movies has been estimated at 3.7

    Income elasticities tend to be higher than unity for books, health services, communications,consumer durables and recreation, while significantly below unity
for food .A selection of estimates for service industries is provided in Table 4.2.
    A detailed study of car ownership and use in Britain provides further insights
into the usefulness of elasticity estimates._9 A summary of the short-run and longrun
demand elasticity values for the income, motoring cost and bus fare variables
with respect to ownership and use of automobiles is given in Table 4.3. The
dependent variables are per capita car ownership and per capita car use. Annual observations were taken for the period 1953_–_96. To explain movements in car
ownership and car use, a number of determinants (independent variables) were
tested including.Five alternative estimation methods were used to estimate these relationships.

    Income elasticities are positive – the higher the income, the more cars are owned
and used. As economic theory would suggest, the long-run income elasticities are
greater in absolute value than their short-run counterparts. Cars emerge as a
luxury good in the long run, a finding that is consistent with simple observation
of the increasing congestion on British roads as people become more prosperous.
Car use income elasticities are greater in absolute values than the corresponding
car ownership elasticities – adjusting car use is easier than adjusting car ownership.
Motoring costs can be interpreted as a proxy for the ‘own’ price of car ownership
and use, and hence increases in costs have an expected negative effect on demand. Bus journeys are substitutes and an increase in bus fares has a positive effect on
demand for car ownership and use. The size of this effect is surprisingly large, but
surprises are not uncommon in empirical studies of this nature.

Econometric estimation rarely ‘lets the statistics speak for themselves’. Quirky
and idiosyncratic results are not unusual and the researcher who is frank about
them deserves credit rather than censure. There is a danger of trying too hard to
find estimates which the researchers will consider ‘plausible’ and accord with
‘intuition’ based on economic theory.

    Finally, some further warnings about the reliability of elasticities should be
noted. Most elasticities are estimated on the basis of historical experience. They
may prove to be unstable, since the past is not always the best guide to the future.
Also, elasticities are defined in relation to a particular market but, as we have seen,
the relevant market segment has to be found by careful analysis. The manager of a
football stadium, for example, may find that different groups have quite different
price elasticities, depending on how stadium seats are organised and segregated.
Similarly, a theatre or a hotel will explore opportunities for segmenting the
market .From a revenue-maximisation point of view, the more degrees of segregation the better. Another important point is that markets are
dynamic entities. Demand for products can be cyclical, leading to systematic
changes in elasticity values over time. Sometimes, though rarely, the advent of a
new product can lead to an increase in demand for a product which is consumed
jointly with it, such as happened to the cassette market following the success of
the Sony Walkman. Elasticities change in value over time. Markets are evolutionary,
not static. Finally, businesses that are interested in elasticities of a much narrower
segment of the market than is amenable to standard econometric analysis

will have to resort to more informal estimation methods.