Monday, October 28, 2013

Diseconomies of scale


    Unit costs tend to rise in the short run because, among other reasons, employees
will have to be paid overtime. A point may even be reached where they start to get
in each other’s way. As output increases, there is a build-up of stress and friction
on managers, machines and materials as they are pushed to the limit. Also, standard
scale economies become less effective. Learning-by-doing in any particular
activity occurs at a declining rate and eventually reaches zero. Employees too can
become over-specialised, leading to loss of adaptability and initiative.

    In the long run, these problems can be addressed by expanding the size of the
plant, buying more machines and adding to staff. Management systems can be
developed, and bottlenecks and constraints can be systematically addressed. The
long-run overall average cost of the firm may continue to slope downwards for a
considerable range of output. Successful firms tend to see a continuous downward
trend in unit costs. Yet the constraints on minimum efficient size eventually
become binding, at different scale levels in different industries.

    After a certain output level, diseconomies of scale swing into action. These
involve increases in unit costs as output rises. Diseconomies of scale take a number
of forms.

1. Informational requirements grow as the firm becomes larger. Instead of the informal
communication system of a small firm, larger firms have to employ special
systems to disseminate information.
2. Management control becomes more difficult as firms get bigger, leading to
higher unit costs.
3. Industrial relations problems can become more acute, and disproportionate
effort has to be devoted to motivating staff and cultivating corporate esprit de
corps.
4. As firms become larger they suffer a loss of flexibility. Customised demand
becomes harder to cater for.
5. Transport costs set limits to size in some industries. For this reason, corrugated
cardboard manufacturing and construction materials, such as cement and
gravel, usually have to be installed nearer the consumer than in many other
industries. This sets a limit on plant size.

    The scope for exploiting scale economies and for avoiding diseconomies of
scale is in a constant state of flux. ‘New wave’ manufacturing strategies, variously
labelled as world-class manufacturing, lean production, flexible specialisation,
post-Fordism and Total Quality Management, can restore economies based on
new forms of work organisation. To raise productivity, teams or groups can be
formed around the production of common parts or the search for customers._13
Lean production, for example, is based on teams of multi-skilled workers and flexible
automated machines. It is ‘lean’ in that it uses fewer inventories, less space
and more teamwork, with an objective of zero defects and minimum inventory.
It strives to combine the advantages of mass production and craft production.



    In some industries the optimum scale of operation is increasing, but in others the advent of new technology has given a renewed lease of life to smaller firms. Computerised reservation systems provide special advantages to larger airline carriers, but information technology has improved the ease and cost of access of smaller firms to data which previously only a large firm could have afforded to acquire. Major drug companies find that they can control the rising cost of innovation by contracting out research to smaller specialised medical research companies. Chiroscience and Celsis, two of Britain’s most successful medical research companies in the 1990s, founded by biotechnology entrepreneur Chris Evans, were started in this way. Quality control, likewise, in the sense of quality assurance and strategic quality management,has become less expensive at smaller scales of output as a result of computer- aided design and the microcomputer. Flexible batch production has reduced the plant size at which the minimum cost point, or the minimum efficient scale of operations ,is attained. Changes in telecommunications technology, such as the development of mobile phones and satellite communications, exposed many former state-owned monopolies in Europe to competition from smaller competitors. The telecoms industry no longer requires enormous sunk costs in the form of cables linking every receiving household.

No comments:

Post a Comment