First, there are indivisibilities.
Indivisibilities are costs incurred in large non-incrementalcamounts, such as
the cost of constructing a tunnel or a nuclear energy
plant. A
half-built tunnel is costly to make, but useless. A half-built nuclear
reactor is
likewise costly, but dangerous. Each project becomes useful when the
entire
project is completed. Completion may be a large-scale and expensiveexercise.
The Channel Tunnel
between England and France cost
more than £10
billion
sterling to construct. These sunk costs had been incurred, and the
accompanying debt remained to be serviced, without a single train or passenger
having passed through. As the ‘output’ of the tunnel increases, the fixed costs
are spread over a larger volume of traffic. Average fixed cost per unit of
output falls.
Hence average
cost, i.e. total cost per unit, declines. The more passengers using the
tunnel, the
lower the cost per unit.
Indivisibilities are encountered in many areas
of business. For example, the costs of R&D and product design have to be
incurred long before production begins. As the product reaches the market and
is sold, these initial fixed costs are spread over a larger volume of output.
The cost of developing a new car and bringing it to the market can involve an
outlay of more than $1 billion over a period of two or more years before a
single car is sold._7 The average pre-tax cost of developing a
successful drug is $150m, which rises to $500m if costs of failures are included.
As test procedures become more demanding and as science tackles more complex
diseases, these indivisible costs are rising all the time. From the author’s
point of
view, it costs the same to get one copy of a book ready for publication as
1000 copies.
To get a new food product onto a UK supermarket shelf can cost as
much as £3
million in marketing, advertising and promotion expenditure. The
essential
feature of these expenditures is their ‘indivisibility’.
Another source of scale economy is increased
specialisation. Adam Smith
observed
that, as a firm’s output increased, its cost per unit declined because
employees
would become more dextrous and skilled and, by focusing intensively
on a narrow
range of activities, would be able to suggest improved ways of
performing
their work and even devise better machinery to assist. Skinner’s concept of a focused
factory puts these ideas into modern garb:
A factory that focuses on a narrow product
mix for a particular market niche will outperform the conventional plant, which
attempts a broader mission. Because its equipment, supporting systems and
procedures can concentrate on a limited task for one set of customers, its cost
and especially its overheads are likely to be lower than those of a conventional
plant. But, more important, such a plant can become a competitive weapon
because its entire apparatus is focused to accomplish the particular manufacturing
task demanded by the company’s overall strategy and marketing objective._8
Two modern versions of Smith’s scale
economies through specialisation focus
on core
competencies and learning-by-doing. Core competencies state that a
firm can use specialised skills across many products to exploit acquired
competence.
Learning-by-doing
economies arise because of growth in the firm’s cumulative
output. The longer the firm remains in
business, the more technical and marketing
experience
accumulates, which translates into lower unit costs. A ‘learning’
elasticity of 0.2 has been estimated for
the aircraft production industry; production
costs
decrease by 2 per cent, with a 10 per cent rise in output. Know-how and
technological
expertise embodied in the workforce rise with the number of aircraft
that have
been produced._9
The statistical law of large numbers is
another factor helping to reduce unit costs.
The optimum
level of inventories grows with the square root of sales not proportionally
with sales. Economies of increased dimension, or
‘engineering’ rules, also account for
the reduction in unit costs with extra sales
volume. This
source of scale economies is important for storage and transport activities.
Capacity increases with volume, while cost is more closely related to
area – hence the economies of huge
warehouses, supertankers, pipelines and beervats.Imagine a box 2 " 2 " 2 with a volume of
8 m_3. The area of the box consistsof six sides, each of which is 4 m_2.
Total area # 24 m_2. Now consider the effects ofdoubling the dimensions
of the box to 4 " 4 " 4. Each side of the box now measures16 m_2.
Total area # 96 m_2, but cubic capacity increases to 64 m_3.
Thus,while storage capacity increases eight-fold, costs increase only
four-fold. Another example of this phenomenon is the tendency for the cost of
operating a machine to vary by the capacity of the machine raised to
the power
0.6 – the Haldi_–_Whitcomb ‘0.6 rule’._
No comments:
Post a Comment