The profit-maximisation assumption is
important, because it has strong implications for how firms behave. These
implications apply both to the pricing decision and to the output decision.
Where competition is intense, the firm has little
or no
discretion over price. It takes price as given. The key decision becomes how
much to
produce. The company must also decide what techniques to use in
its
production: how much labour, what type of machinery, buildings and raw
materials.
In making these decisions, a profit-maximising firm will be guided by
certain
rules.
A first rule is that a technically
inefficient production technique should not be used. If 100 units of output
could be produced by using 80 units of labour and 100 units of capital,
or 60 units of labour and 90 units of capital, technique will always be
chosen by the profit maximiser. This profit maximisation objective
dictates that the firm will seek out best practice technologies and
avoid waste.
Second, the firm minimises the cost of
producing any given level of output. It minimizes costs by applying the
rule: purchase each input up to the point where the net value of the
output produced by that input equals the cost to the firm of purchasing it.
The input might be the services of an employee, a new machine, additional
quantities of raw materials or more warehousing space. The marginal cost of the
input to the firm is the price paid . The value of the extra output produced by
each input to the firm equals the extra output multiplied by price .
Suppose this were not the case. Say the
value of the marginal product of an
employee is
£100 per day (net of material costs), while the cost of hiring him or
her is £60
per day. At the same time, the marginal product of the new machine is
£60, but the
cost of running it is £100 per day. Then, assuming no other costs, the
firm is
making £40 per day profit from the marginal employee and losing £40 per
day from the
marginal machine. The profit-maximising firm should hire more
labour and
fewer machines!
The third rule is that the firm must
produce up to the point where marginal
revenue equals marginal cost. Recall
from Chapter 4 that marginal
revenue
equals the increase in total revenue derived from the sale of one additional
unit.
Marginal cost is defined analogously as the increase in total cost
incurred by
the production of one additional unit. Suppose the marginal revenue
from an
additional unit of sales is £10 and marginal cost is only £5. Clearly, it is
profitable for the firm to produce that unit. Suppose that the next unit also earns a marginal revenue
of £10 but that its marginal cost rises to £8. It is profitable to produce that
unit also. The firm will increase production up to the level where the marginal
cost and the marginal revenue are equal. At any lower output, marginal revenue
exceeds marginal cost and unexploited opportunities for profit would be
ignored. At any higher output,marginal cost exceeds marginal revenue. The firm
incurs losses at the margin, and that too is inconsistent with profit
maximisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment